Mesh Implant Erosion Resulting In Lawsuit

Medical studies have shown that the vaginal mesh popularly used by gynecologists to repair pelvic organ prolapse (POP such as cystocele or urethrocele) or treat urinary incontinence has huge evidence of serious complications. Unfortunately, even many doctors today don’t understand the complications of erosion of the mesh through the vagina.

Any surgical mesh used to repair stress urinary incontinence (SUI) or pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is at a risk of erosion, failure, and the need for repair. These devices used the 510(k) clearance to get the FDA approval without testing. Soon enough after their introduction to the market, the devices started showing up some serious complications. Some of the most severe symptoms reported in the mesh lawsuit update include the following such as:

•       the mesh eroding through the bladder, vagina and bowel
•         recurring infections
•          vaginal scarring, or erosion of the vaginal tissue
•          recurrence of uterine prolapsed and vaginal prolapsed 
•          urinary problems such as incontinence
•          pain during intercourse (medically called dyspareunia)

  

What steps has the FDA taken?

On October 2008, the FDA issued a Public Health Notification addressing the healthcare practitioners alerting them of the health issues linked with the transvaginal placement of surgical mesh.  The agency had received over 1,000 reports of complications arising from the use of TVM and that the most frequent complications included issues such as erosion through vaginal epithelium, urinary problems, infection, pain, and recurrence of prolapse and/or incontinence.

On July 2011, the FDA issued a safety communication update highlighting serious complications associated with the surgical mesh for transvaginal repair of POP are not rare. Growing number of evidence and review of scientific literature had shown that ‘’transvaginal public organ prolapse repair with mesh does not improve symptomatic results or quality of life over traditional non-mesh repair.’’

Class action or personal lawsuit?

As the medical device manufacturers’ failed to adequately explore the potential risks and complications associated meshes, the victims might be eligible for damage awards in terms of financial compensation. Patients can file for either a vaginal mesh lawsuit or class action claim.

What are the main issues in the mesh lawsuit update?

•          Using wrong and misleading information to showcase the safety and efficiency of the mesh devices to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the medical community, and patients about the true safety and effectiveness of the products.
•          Did not properly conduct any study and research on the devices
•          Failed to inform about the risk and complications
•          No safe known procedure for the mesh removal

The transvaginal sling lawyers at TVM411.info are providing free consultations and claim evaluations for those who have experienced complications following the surgery to repair POP or SUI.

All consultations are confidential with the experts of TVM411.info and after reviewing a potential lawsuit, there is no obligation to hire their law firm. You do not have to pay any attorney fees unless you obtain the compensation.

Visit : tvm411.info

Mesh Manufacturers That Faced The Most Lawsuits

Transvaginal mesh lawsuits are not uncommon in the world of medical device disputes. As a matter of fact, thousands of mesh lawsuits have been filed leading to billion dollars settlements, though many of the cases still lie unsettled. The transvaginal mesh lawsuit update speaks for all those legal cases that accounted for the largest mass torts in medical history. To pick out the ones who paid the maximum compensation in terms of dollars, names like Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon top the list.

Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon:

Johnson & Johnson faces more vaginal mesh lawsuits than any other manufacturer. Here are top three results from some of the lawsuits that have turned out in favor of mesh victims:

• In September 2017, a Philadelphia jury awarded $57.1 million to Ella Ebaugh, who suffered chronic pain and incontinence because of two Ethicon pelvic mesh implants that eroded into her urethra. The victim required three surgeries to get the mesh removed.

• Back in March 2018, a jury in Indiana awarded $35 million to Barbara and Anton Kaiser. Ethicon was sued by them, after the mesh was proven to cause her pelvic pain. They were awarded with $10 million in damages and more $25 millions n punitive damages.

• In April 2017, a Philadelphia jury awarded $20 million to a victim who was supposedly in constant pain due to her TVT-Secur transvaginal mesh, a product of Johnson & Johnson subsidiary Ethicon.

C.R. Bard:

New Jersey based C.R. Bard has already settled some of the vaginal mesh lawsuits, but more than 10,000 cases still remain unresolved. Few of the notable settlements include:

• In April 2018, a New Jersey jury awarded $68 millionto Mary McGinnis, who suffered from debilitating injuries because of Bard’s pelvic mesh. The jury award included $33 million in compensatory damages and $35 million in punitive damages.

• The company paid more than $200 million its second large scale mesh settlement in August 2015 to resolve an approximate of 3,000 cases (nearly $67,000 per case). The payout was made to avoid a string of multi-million dollar verdicts that could lead to bankruptcy for Bard.

• The first large-scale settlement by Bard was in October 2014 where the company paid more than $21 million to settle more than 500 mesh lawsuits.

If you are yet to file your lawsuit and still suffering silently, it’s time to take action. Get motivated by the compensation amounts in the transvaginal mesh lawsuit updates, and get in touch with TVM411 on Tvm411.info or at 888-730-1979 for details.

Are You Affected By TVM Implant?

Have you undergone a pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair or stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery using a transvaginal mesh product? If yes, you are at an increased risk for surgical mesh complications according to the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) compared to women who have received alternative treatments to cure both these conditions.

Hundreds and thousands of women have submitted complaints to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) about their experiences with pain, vaginal scarring, recurring prolapses, organ perforation and more. They joined together in massive multidistrict litigation (MDL) cases, suing the mesh manufacturers for financial compensation. Many of these mesh lawsuits are still pending and the other victims who have been harmed in the defective mesh implant can join such MDLs.

By the summer of 2017, transvaginal mesh manufacturers had paid out billions to settle allegations surrounding their products. The following are some of the major lawsuits that set legal precedent you should be aware of in the mesh lawsuit update:

• Boston Scientific Corp. lost an enormous trial when patients complained about recurring bladder infections and pelvic pain, and ended up requiring two additional surgeries.

• Ethicon (Johnson & Johnson) faced million dollar fines when patients complained about experiencing mesh erosion and complained about intense chronic pelvic pain.

• R. Bard’s Avaulta products for pelvic organ prolapse in patients and needed corrective surgeries. They had to pay for punitive damages.

The common complications reported in the mesh implant surgery include:

• Erosion of Mesh Product

• Urinary Issues

• Infection

• Bleeding

• Blood Vessel Perforation

• Discomfort

• Painful Intercourse

• Vaginal Scarring

• Perforation of the Bowel & Bladder

Manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products who have been named in the lawsuit include:

• Johnson & Johnson

• American Medical Systems

• R. Bard, Inc.

• Boston Scientific

• Coloplast

• Mentor

• Neomedic

A vaginal mesh lawsuit may be necessary to collect the financial compensation you deserve. Contact the transvaginal mesh attorneys at Tvm411.info and discuss with the experts the merits of your damages claim. TVM411.info are dedicated to the pursuit of justice on your behalf, and you only need to pay if your case is won.

Why You Should Appoint TVM Lawyers?

Mesh implant is one of the most common and preferred procedure in the U.S for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women. About 3.7 million meshes have been sold globally between 2005 and 2013. Unfortunately, the complications of surgical mesh procedures are still subject of international debate and scrutiny.

Approximately 200,000 women undergo the inpatient surgical procedure of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in the U.S. every year. About 13% of the women who undergoes the surgery are likely to have a corrective operation within five year and more than 30% would risk another surgery for prolapse or a related condition, revealed a study.

Do you know what the main complications of the mesh implant are? Here's the list

• Mesh erosion

• Urinary problems

• Vaginal scarring

• Bleeding from vaginal region or unusual discharge of fluids

• Chronic yeast infection

• Inability to sit

• Bladder and bowel perforation

The transvaginal mesh lawyers help the victims to file legal action against the manufacturing companies for misleading them with the safety and effectiveness of the devices. The victims who are harmed by the vaginal mesh implant can claim for financial compensation of the ongoing and future medical expenses, wage loss, inability to earn in future and the pain and suffering. The manufacturing companies continued advertising the product even though there were reports about the complexities of the mesh implications. They failed to conduct thorough clinical research before releasing them into the market.

In 2011, the public interest safety group Public Citizen called upon the FDA to the recall non-absorbable synthetic transvaginal surgical mesh. The patients noted that the non-absorbable meshes “should be recalled because they offer no significant benefits but expose patients to serious risks and the potential for permanent, life-altering harm.”

If you know someone who has suffered from any of the above injuries, get in touch with the team of TVM411.info. Schedule a free evaluation of your case to find out about the lawsuit and its complications. Also, they will help to find out whether or not your case qualifies for financial compensation.