Friday 27 September 2019

Mesh Implant Erosion Resulting In Lawsuit


Medical studies have shown that the vaginal mesh popularly used by gynecologists to repair pelvic organ prolapse (POP such as cystocele or urethrocele) or treat urinary incontinence has huge evidence of serious complications. Unfortunately, even many doctors today don’t understand the complications of erosion of the mesh through the vagina.



Any surgical mesh used to repair stress urinary incontinence (SUI) or pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is at a risk of erosion, failure, and the need for repair. These devices used the 510(k) clearance to get the FDA approval without testing. Soon enough after their introduction to the market, the devices started showing up some serious complications. Some of the most severe symptoms reported in the mesh lawsuit update include the following such as:

  •       the mesh eroding through the bladder, vagina and bowel
  •         recurring infections
  •          vaginal scarring, or erosion of the vaginal tissue
  •          recurrence of uterine prolapsed and vaginal prolapsed 
  •          urinary problems such as incontinence
  •          pain during intercourse (medically called dyspareunia)

  
What steps has the FDA taken?
On October 2008, the FDA issued a Public Health Notification addressing the healthcare practitioners alerting them of the health issues linked with the transvaginal placement of surgical mesh.  The agency had received over 1,000 reports of complications arising from the use of TVM and that the most frequent complications included issues such as erosion through vaginal epithelium, urinary problems, infection, pain, and recurrence of prolapse and/or incontinence.
On July 2011, the FDA issued a safety communication update highlighting serious complications associated with the surgical mesh for transvaginal repair of POP are not rare. Growing number of evidence and review of scientific literature had shown that ‘’transvaginal public organ prolapse repair with mesh does not improve symptomatic results or quality of life over traditional non-mesh repair.’’



Class action or personal lawsuit?
As the medical device manufacturers’ failed to adequately explore the potential risks and complications associated meshes, the victims might be eligible for damage awards in terms of financial compensation. Patients can file for either a vaginal mesh lawsuit or class action claim.

What are the main issues in the mesh lawsuit update?
  •          Using wrong and misleading information to showcase the safety and efficiency of the mesh devices to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the medical community, and patients about the true safety and effectiveness of the products.
  •          Did not properly conduct any study and research on the devices
  •          Failed to inform about the risk and complications
  •          No safe known procedure for the mesh removal


The transvaginal sling lawyers at TVM411.info are providing free consultations and claim evaluations for those who have experienced complications following the surgery to repair POP or SUI.



All consultations are confidential with the experts of TVM411.info and after reviewing a potential lawsuit, there is no obligation to hire their law firm. You do not have to pay any attorney fees unless you obtain the compensation.

Visit : tvm411.info

No comments:

Post a Comment